Tag-Archive for » cameras «

Lomography Action Sampler


Takes Four Lomos In One

Four lomography shots with just one click? How can that be possible?

That is something that has been bothering your mind for some time now when you heard of the Action Sampler. And you certainly just cannot believe that there is such a thing. Perhaps if it was said that the Action Sampler could take four different shots with just one press of a button and just hold it down while the takes all shots, then it is very much possible. However, if you say that it takes four shots with just one press, now that can be quite difficult to accept.

To make things easier for you to believe, just think of it this way. The Action Sampler is a lomography camera and when you say lomography, it means that it certainly can be one really weird type of camera so much so that it can take not so ordinary photos. That is lomography to most people.

And so the Action Sampler has been created so much so that it has four lenses. That is what allows the camera to take four photos with just one shot. And since these four lenses are not located on top of each other, you will then be able to capture one scene with four different angles. Now that is something you cannot do easily with a normal camera.

People who are into lomography oftentimes have to deal with the shutter speed or the aperture or maybe the focus. But if you have got the Action Sampler, all you need to think about is just which scene you would like to shoot and just you want it to look like. You may have to do some experimenting first with a roll of to see how the camera works at first but once you get into its groove, you are definitely on your way to lomography greatness.

What kind of film do you need for this camera? Well, all you need to do is load it with a 35mm film since this unit made for lomography is a 35mm camera. It is just a small one and it weighs only a hundred grams at that so that means you would not even notice that it is in your pocket or in your bag. At first glance, you may think that it resembles an alien with its four lenses but take pictures and you will forget all about its appearance.

About the Author

Paula James is a 25-year-old online marketing executive at Gadget Epoint. The love for gadgets runs through her veins having grown up with a father who is into gadgets himself.

Son Fotoğraf Trendler

Teknolojik gelişmelere her gün bir yenisi ekleniyor. Yeni ürünler piyasaya sürülüyor, limitler zorlanıyor, kapasiteler artıyor. Gigabyte'lar , Megaherz'ler, Megapixel'ler... Bu baş döndürücü hız bizim de başımızı döndürüyor. Bilgisayarımızı, kameramızı, cep telefonumuzu, fotograf makinemizi bizde olmayan diğerleriyle karşılaştırıyor, bazen "daha iyisinin" ucuzlamasını bekliyoruz, yada paraya kıyıp "daha iyisini" alıveriyoruz.

Fotografçılık meselesine geldiğimizde de, durum hiç de farklı değil. Bir zamanlar filmler üzerine çektiğimiz kareler hatıra raflarındaki yerlerini çoktan aldı. Artık kimse film üzerine fotograf çekip bunu banyo ettirmeyi düşünmüyor bile. Fotograf da bütün dünyamızdaki herşey gibi "dijitalize" oldu.

Bütün bunlara karşı bir trend bir moda ya da bir karşı duruş olarak retro akımlar aldı başını gitti. Eski gözlükler, şapkalar, elbiseler sandıklardan çıktı. Tarih yine tekerrür etti ve yeninin dayatması karşısında eskiye bir özlem duyuldu. Bu da modada, hayat tarzında ve beğenide bir talep, bir alternatif akım yarattı.

Bu retro akımın etkisini fotografçılıkta da görmek mümkün. Aslında hiçbir zaman tamamen yok olmayan analog fotoğrafçılık yeniden gündeme geldi. Burada hem profesyonel hem de amatör fotografcıların kastedildiğini belirtmekte fayda var. Fakat analog fotografçılıktaki asıl canlanma, Dünya'nın Avusturya'lı iki genç sayesinde tanıştıkları Lomography akımının etkisiyle oldu. St. Petersburg'daki fabrikasını kapanmak üzereyken, üretim bandını hayata döndüren bu gençler, günümüzde alternatif fotografçılık akımlarından biri olan Lomography'yi de hayata geçirmiş oldular. Lomografik fotograflar, parlak ve canlı renkleri etrafındaki vignette dediğimiz siyah bulutumsu gölgeleriyle estetik açıdan diğer fotograflardan ayrıldılar. Bütün amacı, görüntüyü tüm gerçekliği ile yakalamak olan günümüz dijital fotografçılığının karşına, hayalperest, gerçekdışı ve maceracı bir bakış açısıyla dikildiler. Bizi alıp, fotografa bakış açımızı kökten değiştirebilecek cesur ve yenilikçi bir yere taşıdılar.

Günümüzde Lomography'nin ivmesiyle hızlanan analog fotografçılık alternatif bir akım olmaktan biraz daha öteye gitmiş durumda. Bir çok kişi dolabından babasının Zenit'ini çıkardı. Banyoyu nerde yaptırabilirim bunu bilgisayara nasıl atabilirim gibi kaygılara düştü bile?

Lomo fotograf makinelerinin öne çıkan modelleri Diana, Holga, Action Sampler, Fish eye, Lomo LC-A. Türkiye'de Lomo denince Lomonomo akla geliyor. Lomo Türkiye Lomonomo.

About the Author

lomonomo.com provides Diana, Holga, Action Sampler, Fish eye, Lomo LC-A. Türkiye'de Lomo denince Lomonomo akla geliyor. Lomo Türkiye Lomonomo.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Rangefinder Camera Body


Review Panasonic DMC GF1K K

It's mostly a great camera. I was surprised when I learned that the flash doesn't work in the My Color (Retro, Dynamic Art, etc.) mode. If you're expecting to be able to make a Retro photo of a darker indoor scene, you're out of luck.

I am an 'old fart' and come from the now very old world of .

I grew up in 4x5 sheet film and still think 35mm format is a 'toy' .. But since I can no longer effectively use my old 120 roll film cameras like the Zeiss Super Ikonta and Hasses' what to do?

I am an amateur with my only requirement being to document my RV trips and the back-country 4WD adventures and the 'less than 5 mile' day hikes, so I may as well use one of these new fangled digital cameras.

I always thought my old Nikon F bodies were too heavy for the result they gave and now the new breed of 10 pound DSLRs are even worse yet. It's the same bad trade off today as it was in 1965, nothing has really changed. A ten pound mirror slapping monster with a one ounce result.

The GF1 is very much like my old M2 Leica rangefinder. It has all the benefits of the rangefinders, none of the SLR drawbacks. Faster than lightening to bring into play, very responsive, excellent fit and feel in the hand, and very well thought out in design and manufacture. A one pound camera with a ten pound result ! Rangefinder 35mm of this style and design are the ultimate 'candid' and street cameras, and they can not be beat on the trail unless you are hiking with a pack burro to help you along.

If you are looking for a modern camera that will do the job the old Leicas' did then this is the one for you. The lens and the sensor and the resultant image quality is excellent. You will have no problem up to 11x14 prints and perhaps beyond. I noticed in the excellent dpreview review of this camera that they have some minor moans and complaints about the JPEG engine in the camera. I do not agree with them on this point. If you set the 'my film' settings in the GF1 correctly you can get an almost indistinguishable color result against the RAW. Admittedly you loose some image information in the JPEG, and have to experiment a little with it, but once you develop a 'my film' profile for various standard shooting situations then you are good to go and save yourself the later workload of the RAW development.

The Japanese software that is supplied as a freebie with the camera is excellent, and very sophisticated. You will not have to $300 worth of junk from Adobe unless you want to. Once you get over the 'translation chuckles' of the various menu items in the software you will have a powerful tool in your hands. Admittedly there is a learning curve with any software of this complexity, but it is doable and is a significant value added bonus to the price of the camera.

When even the GF1 is too heavy for me to take on the trail, I pocket my Cannon S90. There is no comparison between the image quality of the Micro 4/3s and the little chip in the Cannon. It is the difference between night and day, apples and oranges. If you are one of those that are tired of the 'almost' image quality of your little pocket digital camera but do not want all the same old - same old SLR negatives, then I don't think you could do better than the GF1. Of course this Micro 4/3 world is just in it infancy and and you will probably watch the world pass you by a little as new cameras of this class are released over the next few years, but you will be taking great shots with it now, and having great fun as well.

If you are one that used to use, appreciated, and understood rangefinders like the old Leicas, and now watch, with disbelief, the endless profusion of so-called "pro grade DSLRs " pour out of Japan then you need to have a close look at the GF1. Only thing it is missing is the wind-lever under your thumb, but hey, you can't have everything.

Read More...

About the Author

DDay DVD

HDTV Prize

Oan's Blog

 

Olympus E-P2 Camera Review

The E-P2 is a 12.3 megapixel interchangeable lens camera, and mixes the high-quality still images from a digital SLR camera High Definition (HD), stereo audio recording and the linear PCM creativity of the camera - all in an ultra-portable, easy-to-body use. The E-P2 also brings a new twist to the line-PEN: a port accessory that adapts to the VF-2 adapter included electronic viewfinder or external microphone (EMS-1).

Like the portrait of the environment, shooting on the street is a sub-genre of documentary photography, and refers mainly to people in candid situations that evoke natural and some aspects of the human condition. Street also focuses on people move through metropolitan environments and complex societies in which they operate. Famous documentary photographers like Henri Cartier-Bresson and Robert Doisneau use 35mm compact cameras to capture many of the moments that define archetypal 20th century European and American society, history and culture.

Rangefinders are small and unobtrusive cameras, however, are very sensitive in the hands of an expert marksman, able to generate images that are as good as those produced by the cameras visible larger, more bulky and more. The gold standard for "street" camera has always been the Leica rangefinder (usually equipped with a normal or moderate wide angle).

The new Olympus E-P2 looks (and handles) much like the classic Leica IIIFs and M4S ingenious folding and 14-42mm Zuiko kit, in a retro eerily similar to the Leitz optical folding of some of these classic cameras of yesteryear. Olympus also offers a lens of f/2.8 17mm main, and two new targets - a 9-14mm and 14-150mm zoom in the works. Both should be available in late spring or early summer of 2010.

The inelegant E-P2 is an integrated service of the reincarnation of the F "Olympus Pen" series of film cameras and looks (and acts) much like the classic tools of the time image rangefinder. The E-P2 3.0 inch (230k) HyperCrystal II LCD is great, Sharp, accurate color, smooth, and has a viewing angle of 176 degrees - which is almost perfect for framing and composition surreptitiously images.

Olympus includes a new clip-on viewer mail, VF2, which gives a 100 per cent with 1.15x magnification. Olympus also offers a clip-on, with no optical viewfinder (the VF1) similar to those in the old rangefinder cameras. The E-Q2 has a maximum sensitivity of ISO 6400 (good for available light shooting indoors in low light), changing the image sensor stabilization and manual control over aperture and shutter speed. Unlike the old days photographers, street shooters today have the option to record HD movies (AVI format - 1280x720 pixels at 30 fps) - and adjust color saturation, contrast, white balance and sensitivity in the camera.

Find more deatils about Digital Camera's at Gadgets Reviews . Find more Free Product Guides at nowbytes

About the Author

Smith is a technology writer at nowbytes and writes all about latest happenings in the technology world.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Polaroid Land Camera


Journey Gifts For Men Are Appropriate For Any Occasion

When you are searching for gifts for men what's the primary thing that involves mind? If you are like most individuals you most likely initial flip to ancient sources like home improvement stores and giant department stores. Which means you are stuck with the identical recent choices year after year. This will create shopping for gifts for men a terribly tedious and troublesome task. It extremely does not need to be that way. All you wish to try and do to spice up your gifts for men buying experience is to vary your mindset. Instead of looking for items, try thinking about experiences. Not only can this make your gifts for men buying much additional fascinating it will build the gifts you up giving an entire lot a lot of satisfying.

Adventure gifts for men are not the same recent thing. These are excursions that are certain to thrill men of all ages and backgrounds. It doesn't matter if you're buying gifts for men who are relatives or close friends. Gifts that bring back the thrill of journey are positive to please.

Suppose concerning the man you are shopping for for. Will he love to observe motor sports or is he additional of a water sport person? Does he look to the skies and marvel what it would be wish to fly? If you'll be able to answer these questions then you can choose the right gift. Journey gift concepts for men that fulfill life long dreams vary from a rare day of rally automotive driving to parachute jumping. You'll also find jet boat outings and kayaking down the white water. These are simply samples of the many journey gifts for men that you'll be able to select from. The only real limit to your options is your imagination.

If you are currently thinking of therefore several nice gift ideas for men that you are having trouble deciding which one is best, you do not need to worry. You can simply purchase a gift voucher for a journey gifts for men therefore that your special man will select the adventure he likes the most. This can be the simplest of all attainable worlds. You're guaranteeing that your special person will be able to fulfill his life long dream for an extreme excursion regardless of his tastes.

You would possibly even think about creating your great gifts for men even more special creating it for two. The sole thing which will make one of those excursions better is having the ability to share them with some one so that war stories can be swapped and common experiences rehashed. Who knows, perhaps you will be really lucky and your special person will raise you to go along. Then you will both be ready to share the results of you having broken the habit of buying just a easy normal gift to purchasing great gifts for men. Indeed, this will be a big day that will never be forgotten. You certainly can not get it wrong with journey gifts for men. Share one with someone you love today.

About the Author

Kitty Cooper been writing articles online for nearly 2 years now. Not only does this author specialize in Home Improvement ,you can also check out her latest website about: Polaroid 600 Camera Which reviews and lists the best

Who Invented Polarized Marterial?

Polarized sunglasses, like many great inventions, are used by many of us without a second thought. But did you ever stop to think about where polarized sunglasses come from? Somebody had to come up with them.

Actually, we owe the creation of polarized sunglasses to four men.  In the 1750s, James Ayscough experimented with using tinted glass to correct vision problems. 

Many scientists of the time were studying the properties of light and color. In 1808,  Etienne-Louis Malus, a French physicist and mathematician,  he discovered that  light waves from the sun, which usually vibrate in all directions, can be aligned into one direction when it is reflected off something, like water. According to Malus’ law, the intensity of light transmitted through a polarizing filter depends on the angle of the filter in relation to the light.

While Malus’ law is important in the study of optics, it remained for Scottish physicist, astronomer and inventor Sir David Brewster to discover the angle at which light with a particular polarization can be transmitted through a surface with no reflection.  This he did in the year 1815. The angle, called Brewster’s angle or the polarization angle), is critical in the invention of polarized sunglasses.

Throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries, experiments continued.  People began using yellow- or brown-tinted sunglasses to counteract light sensitivity. People realized that color had something to do with polarization. The optical company Bausch & Lomb began producing a dark green glass to protect U.S. Army Air Corps pilots from glare at high altitudes.

However, it wasn’t until 1936 that Edwin H. Land, an American inventor, created polarizing light filter that was light and inexpensive enough to use on sunglasses. He later created the Corporation and developed many inventions, including the Land , which allowed amateur photographers to watch their pictures develop instantly.

Land’s invention was quickly put to use in sunglasses produced by Ray-Ban, a unit of Bausch & Lomb. Ray-Ban also created the distinctive “aviator” frame that protected a pilot’s eyes as he repeatedly glanced down at his instrument panel. Army pilots received these glasses for free and as their popularity grew, Ray Ban soon began to sell them to the public. The polarized sunglasses helped pilots to see and complete their missions safely. Their ultra-cool and effective sunglasses added to the pilots’ mystique and soon everyone wanted them in order to imitate their heroes.

Polarized sunglasses are one fashion trend that continues to serve a useful purpose.

 

About the Author

Polaroid still make sunglasses today and now specialize in sports sunglasses.

http://www.polaroidsunglasses.co.uk/


Polaroid i1437 14MP Titanium Digital Camera (Refurbished)


Polaroid i1437 14MP Titanium Digital Camera (Refurbished)


$46.49


Take professional pictures without the complexity and bulkiness of a traditional professional camera using the i1437 digital camera by Polaroid.

Polaroid 3MP Coral Digital Camera With 1.8-inch LCD Display (6 Pack)


Polaroid 3MP Coral Digital Camera With 1.8-inch LCD Display (6 Pack)


$164.49


This six pack of digital is an affordable way to capture lots of memories whether through video or pictures. These feature a 1.4 inch color LCD screen and take 3 megapixel shots as well as video.

rooCase Hard Shell Polaroid Blue Camera Case


rooCase Hard Shell Polaroid Blue Camera Case


$11.99


This rooCase camera case fits most Polaroid cameras and offers a hard exterior with carabiner and a memory foam interior for soft padding. A mesh pocket and Velcro retaining strap ensure your camera and accessories are kept in place.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Minolta Freedom Zoom


An Encounter With the Bolshoi Ballet

I as many who have read my articles may gather am a tremendous opera fan though in all sincerity I can not claim to be an equal devotee of the ballet, however this should not be interpreted that I do not take joy from it. Perhaps it is because my tastes lean more to the passion of the singers and the drama in the opera rather then the grace of the ballet dancer. What ever the reason I must claim to be a bigger opera fan then ballet fan but in all truth I am a lover of the ballet however I did not become one till I in Santiago, Chile met the members of the Bolshoi ballet. This was a time I will never forget as it made me see all the grace of the ballet however before this encounter with the Bolshoi I had seen them perform in Moscow and perhaps it is there that I was introduced to the ballet. My decision to visit the Soviet Union came during the fall of 1988. It was the time of perestroika, glasnosts and Michael Gorbachov, the new leader of the Soviet Union who many Americans had taken a liking to as they could see a certain honesty in him. I for my part can not claim that my desires to visit the Soviet Union were influenced in any way by Gorbachov as the real reason for my trip was based on my wanting to travel the world, in search of all those cities and places I had read about in my extensive readings of history. Of course this was also at a time in my life when I was entertaining dreams of becoming a professional photographer and had it in mind to take photographs of Leningrad (previously called Petrograd, presently Saint Petersburg) and Moscow. These cities seemed ideal for this purpose, both having architecture that was so diverse from New York and the feeling of history would be enormous. After all these were two cities that had been almost in the center of World War II and the Russian revolutions of 1917. The first of which overthrew Nicholas II while the second in October (though the Russian Orthodox calendar marks this day as having been in November) put the Bolsheviks in power. I had even wanted to visit the Soviet Union before but the matter had not been so simple as I would have wanted it. First off all because the Soviet Union was a closed society I needed a visa; not that this was an inconvenience as I had already visited many other communist countries such as Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Poland, the DDR, and Yugoslavia. These countries also requiring me as an American to have a visa. I can even add how there was a time in 1987 in which I as an American was required to have a visa in to order to enter France as opposed to being given one automatically upon entrance as was the case with most European countries. The Soviet Union however was different, even from other communist countries which only required me to go to their embassy or consulate, naturally with my passport, two photographs and the money to pay for the visa. The Soviet Union not only required me to have the already mentioned but a prepaid hotel where I would be staying, which basically meant that I would either have to reserve a hotel in the cities I wanted to go to before departing New York or go on what is commonly referred to as a “guided tour”. I not so much by my own choice took the second option of going on the guided tour even if in all truth I would have preferred to go alone. It was with the intension of spending Christmas and New Year’s day in the Soviet Union that I in early November booked myself on a tour that would include Moscow, Kiev and Leningrad, in that order. It was while visiting these cities in the Soviet Union that I observed many things, some of which were even strange or at least in my opinion for a communist country (me having already visited several) for instance, in the Soviet Union there were stores which only accepted hard currency (this meaning any currency which could be converted outside its country of origin) and were off limits to Soviet citizens. Yes, passports were checked upon entrance in to the stores. It was not that stores like this did not exist in Poland or other communist countries I had visited but contrary to the Soviet Union in those countries anybody could what they wished so long as they had the right kind of currency, in the Soviet Union it was a case of Soviets not even being allowed to enter the stores, let alone make purchases of any kind. Naturally just as there were stores in which only foreigners such as myself could enter, there were also stores in which foreigners were banned from as only Soviets could enter and again passports or documents were checked. I even recall how on one occasion, somebody I met asked me to him something in the store for foreigners only. The Soviet Union also had other factors which made it different from any of the Communist countries I had already visited for instance again only guests of hotels were allowed to enter as a control was set up at the entrance where one was obliged to show one’s card from the hotel. This however did not present so much of a problem for me nor for many Soviets (I refer to them as such as I can not in all honesty claim to have known who was Russian or from one of the many republics that made up the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) who managed to get in to the hotel in spite of not being a guest of the hotel. Where the card required to enter the hotel was not a problem the fact that I was required to pay everything in hard currency was however more then slightly annoying as this made prices higher then they would have been had I been allowed to drinks or other such niceties in Rubbles, which I could get a lot more of on the black market. This however was not to be as hotels wanted hard currency not only for the cost of the room but even for what one purchased in them, this being in contrast to Polish hotels were one was only required to pay for the room in hard currency. It was in Moscow that I stayed in a hotel called “Cosmos” which I might add was the most exclusive at the time, though in all truth its standards were lower then those which I had known in the west. I arrived at the hotel on the 24th of December and on my second day of being in Moscow after having spent the first two sightseeing; I had what could be called my first experience in the Soviet Union. Two young men who must have been about my age at time (me being 21) knocked on the hotel room which I was sharing with one of the members of my tour group. It was in the company of another member of my tour that these two young men came asking if my roommate and I cared to barter trade. At first neither my roommate nor I knew what these two men had in mind and being in a country we knew not to be democracy; my American roommate, whose name completely escapes me and I were slightly apprehensive. It was one of these two young men who asked us if we had any blue jeans or anything we cared to trade such as American cigarettes or basically anything. I for my part felt I had nothing that would be worth their while as all I had was my (which I was not ready to trade for anything), a couple of packs of cigarettes (me being a smoker at the time), the clothes I had brought with me (which included a pair of grey blue jeans that frankly speaking I was even slightly ashamed to even show given the condition they were in) and my cassettes which included some pop music. It did not take long with these two men and all those from my tour group who had come over to pick up a bargain; for the room I was sharing with a history teacher from Phoenix to become an national or international black market. Blue jeans were being exchanged for Russian fur hats, caviar (this being a French word as the Russian word is “ikra”) and other Russian goodies. It was inspired by the way these two Russians or so I think they were apparently willing to take just about any and everything we had that I decided to show them the old grey jeans I had bought over a year ago in London. Much to my near shock they accepted to take them for a black fur hat though given they were old they did ask me to throw in something extra which I did in the form of a pack of Marlboro which they accepted but however my having guilty feelings over the old jeans compelled me to add a tape by the British band known as “Led Zeppelin”. During these transactions; I noticed how people from two different countries and ways of life could trade and do business and though the English spoken by these two gentlemen was not exactly perfect it was understandable, making me think how even in a communist system it was always possible to find entrepreneurs. I even recall how one of the members of my group wanted to get something in exchange for a Jimmy Hendrix tape only to find out that neither of these two men (who had brought so much stuff with them as to make one believe they had a whole store with them) had the slightest idea who he was. Naturally we explained that Jimmy Hendrix had been a guitar player and they did take the tape though I do not recall what they gave for it. Of course it should be understood that these young men were not getting these things for themselves but to sell to others. One thing did strike my roommate at the time as being curious which prompted him to ask if they were staying in the hotel to which he was told by one of these two young men that they were not. It was then that I asked how they managed to get in the hotel, me having been told that only hotel guests who showed a card from the hotel were allowed in. It was then that they told us that because their English was not bad and in fact it was not and they dressed like westerns they could get in and obviously they had. Later on I would meet two other young men in the hotel who were also trying to do what ever business they could and it was from them that I really learnt a lot about how people in the Soviet Union felt toward not only Americans but many things. It might seem strange to some how I do not even remember the names of these two young men or even what they looked like but I remember almost everything that transpired between the three of us. First I went with them to Red Square instead of going with my group; after all if I had wanted to associate with other Americans, one can imagine where I would have stayed. Many things had I seen through out my travels in many countries, from the Coliseum in Rome (now one of the world’s seven new wonders) to the Eiffel Tower but neither of these two monuments or any other which I had seen for that matter could surpass the grandness of “Red Square”. The place as I observed it on that frozen day in the month of December seemed so overwhelming that I honestly was at a loss for words. It was not that the Kremlin or any of the buildings surrounding it; such as the one being hailed as the world’s biggest toy store or even Saint Basel’s cathedral were that large but the composition created by all that was Red Square had such a strong initial impact on me that I will never forget. It was mesmerizing to see this place and all its features that for a moment gave me the impression of being in a city above the clouds. The ornaments on the buildings being such that they almost seemed unreal. I naturally after having recovered slightly from my near shock took out my trusty Minolta to photograph this place and all it included; which in all honesty even looked like a small town rather then a large monument. It was in the process of photographing this place that I started with a wide angle lens; as to capture it all in one shot and then moved on to a zoom to get Saint Basil’s cathedral; the beauty of which in my opinion is most underrated. Needless to say my camera captured all of Red Square’s points of interest but none fascinated me as much as Saint Basil’s which to my mind was the typical Russian cathedral. Naturally in all that was Red Square one could not ignore the presence of the mausoleum dedicated to Lenin; which was visited by the thousands who would bare the cold and heat just to see the of a dead man. As for myself personally I had neither the time or the inclination to stand on a line; even a short one as was the one for foreigners (as opposed to the other one for Soviet citizens) just to see a man in what in my opinion was an act of idolatry. Unsurprisingly by then the Soviet Union having long gone through a process of change had removed the remains of Joseph Stalin from Lenin’s presence, not that this made any difference to me at the time or even now for that matter. After their acting as my personal tour guide, they took me to a small neighborhood restaurant in Moscow, sort of like a bistro (this French word having its roots in a Russian word meaning fast) where we had some sausage and tea. It was there as opposed to the hotel that I discovered how cheap life could be in Moscow for someone who had US dollars or any other kind of western currency, so much so that I wanted to treat my tour guides to what they had consumed only to discover it was them who wanted to do likewise for me. At first I did not really know what to say and asked if I could pay at least for myself but was told it would be a good idea not to offend them by refusing their invitation. This I did agree to. It was during our time together that we discovered many things about each other’s countries, for instance they discovered that New York was not as dangerous a place to live in as they had been lead to believe by American television and their own media while I was also not excluded from finding find out many interesting things. First off all that Soviets, at least the people were not as anti-American as I had thought they would be and what really surprised me was that despite his popularity in America, specially after his last trip which had taken place a few weeks before; Gorbachov was not really liked in the Soviet Union by the average citizen, specially those who were not in the party. This at first seemed almost hard to believe as during his last trip to America (which had taken place on the 8th of December) people had literally lined the streets by the thousands in spite of the cold just to get a glimpse of him, in scenes reminiscent of “Beatlemania” at its peak. I for my account had even gone to where I knew his car would be passing in the hope of getting a photograph. Mine however was done more out of wanting to be a photographer then adoration, this in part motivated by the success I had had the same year in London when on Queen Elizabeth’s birthday of the 10th of June I managed to get a great shot head shot as she was coming down “The Mall” in her open carriage. Gorbachov however was a different matter all together as he was being driven in a closed limo, which made it impossible for me to be able to get any kind of photograph other then one of his car. I even remembered hearing on the news, how he while being driven through Broadway had actually gotten out of his car (much to my regret for not being there to capture on this historic moment) on a day of extreme cold to shake the hands of some of the thousands who were lining the streets just to get a glimpse of him. This naturally caused joy to a lot while panic to his security guards who were as surprised as those who found themselves shaking hands with Gorbachov. It had been a case that Gorbachov had not informed his security of what he would do beforehand and due to this many of the security cars had driven on only to discover after a few seconds that Gorbachov’s car had stopped and that Gorvachov now found himself in the middle of a mob shaking hands with all those who were running up to him. As expected his security had to backtrack themselves to get to him in fear that something might happen which of course did not but I can imagine what anxiety they might have been going through at the time. Among these people there were also protestors from some of the Soviet republics such as Armenia; who even claimed that they felt for the first time that there was a man who at least was willing to hear what they had to say. After hearing that Gorbachov for the most part was not liked I asked what was it about him that most people did not like and to this question I encountered an answer that I did not really understand at the time and that was that most people did not like Gorvachov simply because his personal standard of living was a lot higher then their own. It was not because of political reasons or ideology or anything of the sort but the luxury he had surround himself in. They mentioned how he flew around the world and they could not, how he had a fur coats, a credit card by American Express (given to him I imagine mostly as publicity), expensive clothes while they did not. I at that point did not see anything strange or unusual in this as in America most Americans did not live as well as our president (Ronald Reagan at the time) and if some did not like him; it definitely was not for that reason. There might have been other reasons such as the “Iran Contra scandal” but that was another matter but not because he made more money then they did as this was and still is the case in most countries. This however was a case of what most people had come to accept in most countries that it did not matter that their leaders were financially better off then they were so long as their own standard was acceptable to them. However here in the Soviet Union people did not even want to know that their leaders had more then they did even if it was the top leader. This perhaps was the explanation why Soviet citizens were not allowed to enter certain stores, restaurants or hotels, as they would be exposed to what they could not afford anyway and perhaps that their system of financial equality was not really working all that well. I for my own did not comment on what I had heard; preferring to say nothing since I had not really understood the mentality behind the words and rather then get in to a quarrel with those who had treated me to this humble but pleasant lunch I asked what they thought of American films. This they told me they had seen some but several were being banned such as had been the case with “Red Heat” staring Arnold Schwarzenegger due to a scene in which the character played by Arnold (a Soviet policeman) trades a 10 dollar watch for a 1,000 dollar watch with an American policeman, played by Jim Belushi. I was curious how these two young men even knew about this scene, if they had not seen the but this I did not ask. It was after having a nice meal (which was no worse then what I was getting in the hotel) in this friendly neighborhood place that I took a chance and went to the apartment of one of these two young men to get what they had promised me which was a Soviet military winter coat and a Jersey of the national football team. I having not much of anything to trade offered them American dollars which they did not refuse however we would have to go back to my hotel to get as I did not have them on me. It was when going back to the hotel that I rode the Moscow subway for the first time and was amazed at how often the trains came and how deep it was, a factor which I knew had not been undesirable during World War II given the bombing this city had been submitted to by the German air force. Upon return to the hotel I paid them the money I had promised them plus a pack of “Life Savers” in a gesture after theirs which had been to pay for my sausage and tea. Once concluded, the business of trade by barter with the hour being not far from an evening one I decided to shower and get ready for a night at the ballet. The bolshoi; it would be as if it could be any other being in Moscow, naturally at the Bolshoi (this word meaning great in Russian) theatre. With this in mind I put on my suit, the only one I had brought with me, a nice Cardin (him still being fashionable at the time) on top of which I put on my newly acquired military coat courtesy of the Soviet Union however; it was on the advise of our tour guide that I chose to wear another one. Him telling me that we were in a country were civilians specially foreigners were not allowed to wear Soviet military attire; meaning that it would be wise if I were to put on another coat which I did. The Bolshoi, I must say was something amazing, not so much the theatre which granted was large but not really impressive or at least not as much as the performance given by this magnificent group of dancers whom both my father and grandfather had always told me so much about. Tchaikovsky’s “The Nut Cracker” was what those in my group as well I were privileged enough to see that evening and though I was already familiar with the wonderful music; I was not so much with the dancing that went with it and as I watched, it seemed that this was the most radiant of all the performing arts in regards to its visual aspect. After the ballet, it was back to Hotel Cosmos for a night cap which I took at the bar; shots of Vodka accompanied by caviar which in America was so expensive but in the Soviet Union was literally cheaper then peanuts. The hotel had several bars, and it was in each that there were women, some I could imagine were there to exchange other then just souvenirs for money, while others went in groups looking for any westerner to buy them a drink. By “them” I mean all of them as they came in groups though this did not interest me other then just to see that women in the Soviet Union wore what I would call an excessive amount of make up; despite most of them being much more attractive then the average American woman. The following day came and off to Kiev it was on a plane by Aeroflot. It was something I will never forget; being on the runway and dozing off in my seat during the long wait which was required before take off, when suddenly I was awaken by the feeling of my ears getting blocked by the pressure. I remember being slightly upset; thinking that we had probably spent all that time on the ground and only then was the plane going to take off when the reality was that it was already going to land. Such a smooth take off and flight it was that not only had it not awaken me, I had not even noticed it or it could have been the fact that my cold was making my very drowsy along with my lack of sleep from the night before. Kiev was an interesting city though perhaps not as much as Moscow; but on that particular visit the only thing I recall was being far away from my hotel; me always the one to wonder from the rest and asking a Soviet policeman if he could find me a cab which much to my surprise he did. It being on one that was taking several passengers; in a sort of improvised transportation like I had known in countries like Argentina and Peru. As for the policeman, he told me in broken English how he was from Armenia, a place that had suffered from the effects of an earthquake the previous month, which made me tell him how I had in fact donated 20 USD to a relief organization. I do not know if this man really understood me but when saying goodbye in gratitude for his having found me this means of transportation I handed him one of my packs of cigarettes; which made him give me a small pen knife (which did not even open) in the shape of a fish as he said the word “souvenir” and went off. With Kiev being smaller then both Leningrad and Moscow, our stay was planed to last only one night after which we would be departing for Leningrad. I really can not say what it was in me that night which I was to stay in Kiev that made me do what I eventually did. This being to get what could be classified as extremely drunk. Vodka did I consume and plenty of it; perhaps to show that Italian Americans like their Soviet counter parts could also hold their liquor but what ever it was I did get sauced. In this elbow bending I do seem to recall a Soviet who also engaged in the same as I did after which we started a conversation in trying to solve who were more daft? Me claiming that it was Americans (me referring to those in my tour group) while he made the case for Russians; only to settle the issue by proclaiming a draw between Americans and Russians as to who were the more dippy. In this night that would go down with a certain degree of perhaps over joy my Soviet comrade and I also entertained ourselves by smashing our vodka glasses on the ground, which only managed to draw the attention of some policemen. Police however were called Militia at the time in the Soviet Union and two of them did approach us and when I could not understand what they were saying one of them, caught my off guard with a punch to the stomach. That by all accounts should have knocked the wind out of me. This probably would have been the effect during other circumstances but on that day after half a bottle of Vodka, I did not feel the blow which showed on my face as I did not even bend over in pain. This my reaction which almost sent this policeman in to shock as was clear on his face before I tried to strike at him with my camera, after all he was much bigger then me who only stands at 5’6”. Fortunately nothing became of the incident as the receptionist informed these policemen that I was a guest at the hotel and not some peddler (as they figured) who had come in to trade dollars, which of course was illegal at the time. Leningrad and the last stop on our Soviet trip before our return to the states. Leningrad I must say was more interesting at least from my point of view then Moscow. The city itself was different; after all this had been the capital of the country during the revolutions though that was the past even then as at that time the Winter Palace was the Hermitage. With the Hermitage being one of the world’s largest museums I could not help but spend one whole afternoon there out of the three I had; though one would really require more time to fully appreciate the entire museum. In Leningrad, I was fortunate enough to be given a hotel room which unlike the one in Moscow and Kiev I did not have to share with any of the members from my group. This factor would prove advantageous as I would go on to meet two very lovely young ladies from Kiev by the names of Victoria Ibanchenko and Svetlana. It was with these two friends that I would spend three very lustful evenings (two with Victoria, One with Svetlana), thanks to which I would draw inspiration for “Svetlana Ibanchenko”. Svetlana Ibanchenko being a fictional Russian soprano in my book “New York’s Opera Society”. There was something so romantic yet beautiful in these two that their dreams and ambitions took over me as I was creating this small but important character in my first book. Tragedy would also fill my stay in Leningrad as it was there that I found out that an American airplane (Pan Am) had been the victim of a bomb along with all of the passengers while flying over Scotland. At that moment there was little for me to do but be grateful that it was not I who had been on that flight and continue with the good time I was having; which is precisely what I did. The last night I would spend in Leningrad as I would be leaving the following evening was one I which will stay with me forever. My group and I went to see the Kirov ballet and what an experience it was. The Kirov was no less grand then the Bolshoi though different. My father had told me when I asked him that the difference was that the Kirov was more artistic while the Bolshoi was more dynamic and this I could see as I witnessed their performance of another Tchaikovsky piece; this time “Swan Lake” and what a show it was. They seemed to float in the air; almost as if they could fly and had an energy about them which let them to do as they wished with their bodies with such grace that it was almost like watching angels. Regarding my last two nights; these two were spent with Victoria and who knows what would have become of our relationship had it not been for the “Iron Curtain” which made it almost impossible for her to come live with me in America. I naturally tried to send her an invitation but even this was difficult given the closed system her country had at the time and though I did not have problems regarding money when it came to inviting Victoria over to the States still the matter was more complicated then I would have ever considered possible. It is hard for me to say what would have happened perhaps Victoria and I would have gone on to get married and have children but then my life would have been another, though also interesting. I for my part wish Victoria Ibanchenko from Kiev all the best in what ever she decided to do with her life. Upon my return to New York I naturally dedicated a lot of my time and money to trying to bring Victoria over to America; who in retrospective I can say I had fallen in love with and though my attempts ended in failure, I can in all sincerity say that I did make every effort to have her be with me in America. Once in New York; I also with the inspiration of having been in the Soviet Union still in me, went to see the world famous “Mosayeb” (Russian folk dance company) who just happened to be performing at “Radio City”. This too like the Bolshoi and Kirov was a performance that left me mesmerized as it combined grace and music in a way that also expressed so much though perhaps in a more modern fashion which was no less impressive. As a strange coincidence I will add that on that evening I bumped in to the man who had been our tour guide in the Soviet Union. Actually so much was my desire to have Victoria come to America and interest in what I had seen in the Soviet Union that I even started taking private lessons in Russian, which would come in very useful many years later in 1992 in Chile. A country I would have never imagined would require me to speak Russian. It was there in Santiago that one day after having taken photographs for one of the newspapers I was in contact with saw a poster advertising an upcoming performance by the Bolshoi. By then I was working as a freelance photographer and was not really planning on seeing the Bolshoi; believing it would be expensive but I was glad to see that they were in town. This being something to practically cheer about as there had been a time in Chile, not long before during the reign of Pinochet in which the Bolshoi and all other things from the Soviet Union were banned. It was on the same day after seeing the poster that I walked in to a shoe store where stood a couple; a woman whose slim body gave away that she must have been a ballerina with a man who had what I would classify as an athletic though not muscular build. In all frankness neither caught my attention till I heard them speaking Russian and it was at that moment that my mind put two and two together. The Bolshoi were in town, this woman was very slim and spoke Russian so it was at that moment that I decided to introduce myself; which I did so using the Russian I had learnt in Poland as well as my private lessons. I managed to get their names; hers being Nina Semizorowa (whom I would later find out was one of the Bolshoi’s biggest stars and their top attraction on that particular tour) and his being one which I have forgotten though he was Nina’s husband. Naturally, my being a photographer at the time made it that I had my camera which I used to get a snap shot of the two. I being ignorant about the ballet at the time did not realize that Nina was such a huge star of the Bolshoi and it was not her humble personality that gave her away either as her husband and her were among the most unassuming people I had ever met. This in spite of or maybe because both of them were stars of the Bolshoi; arguably the best ballet company in the world, where only the best are allowed. The Bolshoi being to ballet what the NBA is to basketball or the “Serie A” is to football, basically a collection of the world’s top talent. As a footnote I might add that an English actress named Joyce Frankenberg (later known as Jane Seymour or “Doctor Quinn” on the TV serial with the same name) was once accepted in to the Bolshoi in which she due to injury was only able to give one performance as a prima ballerina. After having chatted to Nina Semizorowa and her husband I quickly got the photo developed and took it over to the hotel where I knew they were staying and it was there where I got to meet the remaining members of the Bolshoi; who had made the trip to Chile. There was something about them that I must confess made them among the most interesting people not only to watch dance but to talk to and as I spoke to them one of their managers invited me over for the following day to not only watch them practice but to take photographs as well. It was that following day that I became a ballet fan, maybe it was knowing them and being able to ask them questions along with seeing the dedication they put in to what they did that made me appreciate the ballet all the more. I took many a photograph which would end up in a couple of Chile’s newspapers though in all truth I do not recall which but what mostly stuck out in my mind was the friendships I made with the members of the Bolshoi ballet specially with a very young dancer of twenty years of age by the name of Anna Petrova. It was through one of the member’s of their entourage that she asked if I cared to take her photograph and mail it to her which I naturally agreed to do. Anna was a shy young girl from Leningrad who spoke English well enough to at least hold a conversation which is what we did and what a delight it was as I not only took photographs (using a whole role of on her) but getting to know her. She being one who could not have exceeded the 5 foot mark by much and whose weight could not have been that much over 100 pounds but in this body held the strength of one who could perform moves of incredible grace as the ballet requires. As far as our conversations were concerned, at least during our first encounter; they mostly centered around ballet with me asking her many question which ranged from what she felt was the difference between the Bolshoi and the Kirov with her telling me that it was difficult to put in to words however it was then that I wanted to try out my father’s theory which she admitted to there being some truth in. I also asked Anna what she felt about the Mosayeb which she claimed to be good but not as good as it had once been 20 years before. Many things were said between Anna and myself that day in a conversation that I found most fascinating but the one answer she gave me which distinguished itself in my mind the most was when I asked her what she thought of American Ballet. It was my question which yielded her reply and it I will never forget as I quote “American, French and British ballet are very strong and good but we’re the best”. A statement which would be hard to dispute prompted my comeback “as is the “dream team” in basketball”. My comment being made as that was the year in which Jordan, Bird, Magic Johnson, Carl Malone and many others showed their incredible talent during the Barcelona Olympic games as the now legendary “dream team”. On that day at the auditorium which had been designated to the Bolshoi; I also got to talk to other members of the Bolshoi; one of them being a friend of Anna’s who told me that he had received several offers from American ballet companies of more money but feared making the move given that he had heard perhaps rightly or wrongly that many American ballet companies went bankrupt. He however was considering the offer made to him by the Geoffrey Ballet but was not sure yet. Other things which this young ballet dancer told me included that he really did not have to watch his diet so much as some of the female dancers and that he felt that there were some dancers in the Bolshoi who had made it not so much because of their dancing abilities but their connections in the party. I of course could not say anything regarding this comment; me not knowing anything with regards but I was surprised at his comment, not so much at what he had stated but that he had at all as I could imagine there was a time, not that long before where one could have been in deep trouble for saying less. The day had been grand but the night would not be less as I was going to be seeing the Bolshoi ballet in action performing scenes from many ballets that included “Swan Lake”, “Sleeping Beauty” and “The Nutcracker” by Tchaikovsky along with others such as “Giselle” by Adams. I particularly remember this last one given that it was the one that featured my new friend (whom unfortunately I have lost contact with) Anna Petrova in the lead role and what a performance she gave. In saying this however I must confess not to be a connoisseur of the ballet as I am other things such as football or singing or acting; which makes it difficult for me to give an impartial view of her performance that evening but to my eyes she was wonderful in the role she played. She danced like a bubble from a bath, bouncing not even on the stage but in the air as she delighted all those present, one of them being the president of Chile at the time; Patricio Aylwin. To me not only Anna but all the members of the Bolshoi danced not as if they were dancing to the music which was playing for them but as if their dancing was creating the music, such was the coordination between music and the moves that it seemed that they were one in the same. As if they were an image that was being created by the music and how grand it was that night as I got to see something that will last with me till the end of my days and all not only due to the spectacle I witnessed but the bond of friendship that had been created. The following day I went to the Holiday Inn to see off the members of the Bolshoi and specially my friend Anna Petrova; whom I had agreed to meet at a certain hour only to find out that she and the rest of the members of the Bolshoi, were not back from an extended interview they were giving to the Chilean press which lasted over two hours. I however did not mind waiting as it was while I was doing so that I met a man from Chile who had been one of the people responsible for bringing the Bolshoi to Chile. We as one can expect talked about the Bolshoi (in Spanish) and how they had been allowed to come to Chile now that Pinochet was no longer president. Freedom of speech however had not come completely as the government, influenced by the Catholic church had banned the British heavy metal group “Iron Maiden” from playing in Santiago on their 1992 tour of South America. Once my friend Anna returned to the hotel our time was limited to say good bye given her late arrival (which she apologized for) and the fact that she and the rest of the Bolshoi had little time to get to their flight on time. Anna and I went for a walk around the hotel which must have lasted about 15 minutes in which we did not talk about the ballet but our lives and taste in music; her claiming to like Elvis Presley apart from Tchaikovsky and me claiming to be found of Iron Maiden apart from opera and classical music. Unfortunately time was not on our side as I would have liked to take her to a nice place for lunch given, not so much due to my physical attraction toward her but my desire to enjoy her company, however this was not to be as we had to limit ourselves to exchanging addresses, so I could send her the photos I had taken of her. I for my part bought her a flower from a street vendor as a token of the short but friendly time we spent together. I would go on to send her the photographs though in all honesty I am not sure she ever received them as I got no reply from her but this does not matter so much as I was truly enchanted by not only me encounter with the Bolshoi but with Anna Petrova.
About the Author

My name is Gianni Truvianni, I am an author who writes with the simple aim of sharing his ideas, thoughts and so much more of what I am with those who are interested in perhaps reading something new. As for the details regarding my life I would say that there is nothing that lifts them above the ordinary. I was born in New York City in 1967 on May 21st and am presently living in Warsaw, Poland where I wrote my first book “New York’s Opera Society” now Available on Amazon.

Have You Got What It Takes?

Have You Got What It Takes?

R. Dodge Woodson

World photographers Organization

Have you got what it takes to make money with a camera? If you are a serious amateur photographer with basic camera equipment, you may have a cash machine in your camera bag. This book is not meant to be a dense, word-heavy manual used to give you all of the information needed for taking professional photographs. If you want a big book on how to make money with your camera, this is not it. When you want a concise guide to getting the most out of your camera with real money-making opportunities, this is it.

Rather than use hundreds of paragraphs and illustrations as I might in a photography how-to book, I am going to make this fast and easy for you. I will tell you what you need to know as quickly and cleanly as I can.

This definitive guide to career opportunities is not going to teach you to be a wedding photographer or a nature photographer. You will not learn the techniques and tactics used for sports . Nowhere here will you find how-to details of capturing photos of birds in flight. Okay, so what are you going to learn?

I am going to show you the down and dirty facts about turning a buck with your camera. Not everything I say is going to be what you want to hear. Life is rarely full of glory with no pain. Photography is not very different. For would-be pro photographers who want to make some serious money in legitimate ways, this is the straight-talk guide to the facts.

Now that you know that this is not going to be sugar-coated crap to lull you into fantasy land, let’s dig into the actual earning potential for you as a photographer. We will start with equipment and progress to personal skills and personalities.

Equipment

What do you need for equipment to make money in photography? It depends greatly on the type of photography you decide to pursue as a career. Do you have the basics of what is needed to take a stab at making money with photography? Let’s take this piece by piece.

  • Do you own a quality 35mm digital camera? In today’s competitive world, you will find that digital photos are a necessity.
  • What should you look for in a good ?

Look at the number of megapixels that the camera will take photos at. Don’t buy a camera that produces less than 8 megapixels. Getting a camera body that shoots 10 megapixels is a better buy for longevity. As cameras continue to get better, the higher the megapixel rating you start with, the longer it will be suitable for competitive work.

  • Do I need a camera body that uses removable and interchangeable lenses?

A Single Lens Reflex (SLR) camera with interchangeable lenses is best, but you can get started with a fixed-lens camera. The cost of having an interchangeable system may be more than you want to spend to test the waters.

  • Will a built-in, pop-up electronic flash good enough for a money-making camera?

This type of flash is limited in use, but it has little effect on taking photos in natural light. If you are going to shoot with independent flash equipment in a studio, make sure your camera body is equipped with a PC connection. Cheaper cameras do not offer this feature. Adding a hot-shoe-mounted flash is going to be desirable if you do much flash photography.

  • How important is a camera brand?

The brand of camera you use is not very important unless you are building a system around the camera body. By this I mean that you would not want to invest a lot of money in interchangeable lens that are not suitable for the ultimate camera of your choice. Personally, I started with a Minolta SRT 101® many years ago. It was my first “Real” camera. Then I went to Canon® and built a system around it. When digital came around, I sold my film gear and bought Canon digital equipment. You will normally find that most pros use either Canon or Nikon® equipment.

  • Are zoom lenses okay for professional work?

Most professionals avoid zoom lenses when they can. The pros prefer what they call “Prime” lenses. These are fixed-focal-length lenses that provide sharper photos than zoom lenses can. But, zooms are fine for basic photography needs and you can use them when getting started as a working pro.

  • What about tripods?

Tripods and monopods come in various styles, designs, and prices. A macro photographer will want one type of tripod while a studio photographer may want a different style of support. Monopods are a terrific investment. They are not needed, but they do add a lot of stability at a small price. The type of photography that you pursue will dictate your needs for camera support. There is plenty of photography work that can be done without anything more than your hands for support.

  • Gadgets are great fun to buy and some of them are very useful, but not of them are needed for getting started as a pro photographer.
  • Filter systems can enhance photos quickly. They are not needed, but the filters can add plenty of flavor to your photos. The gel-type filters work well and are relatively inexpensive.
  • Camera bags can cost a lot of money. Some photographers are mesmerized by the assortment of bags available. When you are getting started, you can get by with a basic backpack or carry-on bag. Buy some foam padding. Cut it to fit your bag to protect your gear, and you are in business with very little cash being spent on a way to carry your equipment.
  • What other stuff will I need? You should have a second camera battery charged up and with you at all times. Get a few memory cards so that you never run out of room for photo storage. Invest in a cleaning kit and use it. A wide camera strap makes carrying cameras with heavy lenses easier on the shoulder. Buy a photographer’s vest. It is a good investment for all types of photography. The other stuff falls into the gadget categories until you perfect your personal needs.
  • How much does all this basic equipment cost? I am not going to turn this book into a price guide. Prices change quickly in the shutterbug world. That said, I would estimate that you could get a very nice Canon SLR with interchangeable lens capability for less than $600 new. By the time you add a lens and whatever, you are probably looking at between $1000 and $1500. Of course, you can usually find good used equipment at very affordable prices. It is worth a look if you are not sure what you want to do with photography.

Heavy-duty pro gear is expensive. You can expect to spend $2500 to $7500 for a camera body and then the pro lenses will hit you for anywhere from about $700 to over $8000, per lens. You certainly don’t need this type of pro gear in the beginning and with some exceptions, you probably will never have an absolute need for it. But Boy, most of us want it!

Personal Preference

Your personal preference in the type, or types, of photography to pursue will dictate your equipment needs, your likelihood for making money, and so forth. What do you want to do? If you love taking pictures of spiders, go for it, but know that you have a very limited niche market. Shooting weddings on weekends can bring in thousands of dollars a week. To a large extent, this book is aimed at showing you your options and educating you to a point where you can make a viable decision.

Skill Level

What is your skill level as a photographer? Regardless of where you fall on the scale of skills, you can invest the time and money needed to increase your skills. Once you know what you want to do, you can concentrate of specific workshops that cover your type of photography. For example, underwater photography is not a common field of endeavor. To be really good at it, you need some special instruction. Before you sell yourself as a photographer, make sure that you are competent to take photos that don’t look like Granny snapped them on her old Brownie®.

Your Personality

Your personality can guide you to the right path in your photography career. If you don’t like bugs, nature photography probably is not for you. People who had to deal with models who are too demanding might enjoy pet photography. Perhaps you should be a press photographer and do all the fun stuff that goes with this special classification of photographer. You can obtain PRESS credentials from the World Photographers Organization, www.wpomembers.com, as a photographer for their magazine, World Images Today.

Cash on Hand

How much cash on hand will you need to get started? It depends on what you are doing, where you are doing it, and how aggressive you plan to be. There is no clear-cut answer. Assuming that you have the basic essential equipment, you should be able to get some business by spending $500, or less. Once you get some work, the word of mouth from happy customers will help to keep you busy. This is how a lot of full-time professionals made it to working full time with their cameras.

Okay, I am sure we could talk about more details, but let’s cut to the chase and start looking at the various types of photography that you can actually make money doing.

About the Author

R. Dodge Woodson is a full-time internationally-known, best-selling author and photographer. He created the World Photographers Organization (WPO) as a serious resource for all photographers from point-and-shooters to pros. Photographers of all skill levels come to WPO to learn, to increase sales, and to take advantage of the extensive resources offered by WPO. Having been a pro photographer for more than 30 years and a full-time writer for 17 years, Dodge now feels it is time to share his tricks of the trade with up-and-coming freelancers.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Polaroid One Step

One

Simple Steps For Your Next Family Get Together To Keep Kids And Adults Entertained

Do you have a problem of putting together a children's party and an adult party simultaneously?  These days, joint celebrations are the only solution. Nowadays, it is hard to find a baby-sitter, much less a caring one.. As the host of the party, you are left with no other viable option but to invite the whole family if you ever want to connect the people closest to you.   It may seem difficult to host such an event, but adults and kids' parties do not have to be separated always.  You can have an organized, eventful and fun wing-ding all rolled into one. Here are some practical tips you may think of doing.

Keep ‘em separate:
If your house is large enough, divide the adults from the kids.  The adult area is intended for booze, adult games (such as poker etc.), censored topics and conversations.  The kids area is where the toys and loud video games are located. These spaces must be clearly separated so that the parents and children have minimal interruption. If necessary, arrange the kid's play area in your basement or attic. This will allow you to contain the distracting noise and ensure a more organized celebration for everyone.

Food Selection: 
Tantalize the adults to a special exquisite party feast. Choice meats like steaks, lamb or baked chicken can be served alongside fancy appetizers, salad and wine.  For the kids, you can serve them the usual mouthwatering party food of fried chicken, spaghetti and sodas. Desserts can be shared by everyone. Do not forget that a sure way to a guest's heart is always through his stomach.

Stage it Right :
Another way to define space in a party is with the use of lighting and sound.  Use dimmer mood lighting in the adult's room, coupled with music that your friends or family will enjoy. The children's play room on the other hand must have sufficient lighting to avoid any accidents when they playgames. 

Set the Right Time:
It is good to schedule the party at a time that is most suitable for both adults and kids. If you have to, move the party up an hour or two.  This will give your guests to have ample time to eat, mingle and relax. An earlier start time will also ensure that kids are not partying way past their bedtimes.

Do It Yourself Favors:
snapshot] into a inexpensive party [favor.  You can use a Polaroid or photo printer and laminating machine for this instant party remembrance. Take a individual photo of your guests.  Print the photo and laminate it to the size of your choice. Use a hole puncher to make a well placed hole and attach a small chain to it. Vola! Instant bookmarks, key chains or bag tags. Use a glue gun and attach a magnet for a fun refrigerator magnet. Don't forget to set-up a nice photo area in your home-- like a stylish couch decorated with flowers, a funny artwork staging, or using your gazebo, maximizing the natural lighting from the sun.

About the Author

Criss White is an author for baby shower and family topics. For more party ideas, check out baby shower tableware at My Baby Shower Favors.

History OF The Photo ID

“For Fast, Easy and Certain Identification, Nothing Bests a Photograph”

 

On October 9th, 1804, the Governor of Massachusetts issued a passport to a man claiming to be Joseph Warren Revere, the son of famous patriot Paul Revere.  The passport did not include any description, signature and certainly no photograph of Joseph Revere.

Six month later, in England, the same man applied for another passport, offering as documentation his first passport and a letter of introduction allegedly from his father. The Charge d’ Affaires of the U.S Legation issued the passport on March 15, 1805.  This time the document, signed by Joseph Revere, included a brief description of him.

Were these passports issued to the same man, the man claiming to be Joseph Warren Revere, son of Paul Revere? The Governor of Massachusetts may have been able to vouch for Revere’s identity, but could the same be said of the Charge d’ Affaires in London and the Consul in Rotterdam? Could the man described by the Charge d’ Affaires as being “rather light” in complexion, with a “common” forehead and “large” chin, be described just three weeks later as having a “brown” complexion, with a “low” forehead and “normal” chin?

In fact, the holder of these passports was precisely who he said he was – Joseph Warren Revere, son of the famous patriot. But the discrepancies in the documents, their lack of positive identification and their susceptibility to damage, forgery, alteration and misappropriation, highlight challenges that still confront modern identification technology.  Are we who we say we are? Can we prove it? Can the identifying document be produced easily, quickly and inexpensively? Is it functional and say to use? Is it durable and permanent?

The concern for positive identification is a relatively recent phenomenon. For most of recorded history there was little need for positive identification because people rarely traveled beyond their own town or province.  When they did, there was little point in carrying identification documents because most people couldn’t reed or write.

Nevertheless, for the elite engaged in foreign travel, the use of passports can be traced to 450 B.C.  According to the Bible (Nehemiah 2.7), the King of Persia issued a passport to Nehemiah, the governor he appointed to rule Palestine: “If it please the King, let letters be given me to the governors of the province Beyond the River that they may let me pass through until I come to Judah.”

Prior to 1796 U.S. passports did not contain descriptions of their bearers, probably because they were assumed to be “gentlemen” whose moral standards would preclude misrepresentation and for whom an inspection of their physical features would be considered as insult.

Times and moral coded change. At the end of the Revolutionary War, the Continental Congress created the Department of Foreign Affairs (later to become the Department of the State) responsible for, among other things, the granting of passports.  As of 1976, U.S. passports issued abroad were required to contain physical descriptions. In 1811, the same requirement was extended to passports issued in Washington.

Local and state authorities issued passports until 1856, when Congress restricted to function to the federal Department of State.  Except for periods of war, passports were not required for international travel until 1914: until then they were merely government-to –government requests for safe passage and assistance for their citizens.

Introduction of photography
With the invention of practical portrait by Louis Daguerre in 1839, in became possible to created true and defining photographs of people.  But even the greater of inventions take time to spread throughout society.  remained a complicated and specialized process with few practitioners until 1888 when George Eastman introduced the Kodak Box Camera No. 1.  The camera came loaded with and was returned to the factory for processing, printing and reloading.  In the first two years 1000,000 were sold.

One of the earliest implementations of identification photography was a 1906 test by the U.S. War Department to add photographs to personnel records.

It wasn’t until 1915 that photographs were required comports of U.S passports. Until that time U.S. passports where printed on a single sheet of paper and contained essentially the same information as the design, ornamentation and the use of seals.  Six years later passports were printed on watermarked paper to guard against fraudulent alteration.

On the home front, to prevent spies, saboteurs and “fifth columnists” from infiltrating defense plants and other industries supporting wartime production, the government ordered employers to photograph and fingerprint all workers with access to sensitive areas and issue them photo identification documents that could be easily checked by security personnel. For most employers, this was the first time employee security and identification became a major issue in the workplace.

Unlike the armed forces identification effort, where a single department determined how the order would be satisfied, implementation was left in the hands of employers, subject to the approval of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.  The Order proved somewhat difficult to carry out.

Some employers acted independently. Others, such as 157 companies in Racine, Wisconsin, formed a Manufactures Association that issued a standard identification document to all Racine defense workers led to two popular solutions – the photo button and the photo ID card.  Scores of homemade and commercial camera systems where developed for these purpose.

Photo buttons came in a variety of shapes, usually 1 ½ - 2 inches in diameter and were constructed of two diameter and were constructed of two pieces of brass.  The rear plate was solid metal, onto which was placed a photograph and acetate cover.  The brass cover plate was open in the middle to let the photo show through and had the name and location of the company embossed around its front perimeter.  The entire assembly was inserted into the hand press that bent the cover plate rim around the rear plate.  Any attempt to remove the acetate or pry open the brass was easily spotted.

While companies could send their employees to local photographers to have their portraits taken, many sought out a system that kept the photographic process under their own control, maximizing security, reducing costs, and keeping their workers on site.

Early ID Systems
One high volume ID camera developed for the war effort was the Graflex identification Unit, developed by the Folmer Graflex Corporation of Rochester, N.Y. It had a prefocused 75mm lens and an interchangeable film magazine holding up to 100 feet of 35mm film.  A fully loaded camera could take up to 800 portraits without reloading.

The Graflex camera was attached to an adjustable platform that could be raised or lowered to accommodate the subject, who was photographed standing in front of a height chart with their chest pressed against the front of the platform.  Facing the camera at the end of the platform was an ID holder; under normal operation conditions the system could photograph 200 people per hour.  One user was reported to have photographed as man as 480 people an hour.

Companies that didn’t have access to the Graflex camera or a similar unit, or couldn’t afford such a systems came up with their own solutions.  One such company was the Columbian Steel Tank Co. of Kansas City, Missouri.

In an reprinted in several industrial publications in 1942, advertising manager R.S. Robinson described in detail how Columbian had pieced together a camera system similar in design and function to the Graflex system. Equipped with a $6.35 Kodak Brownie Reflex camera, a window shade for a backdrop, two lighting stands, lights and a die cutter, the total system cost was $30.  Each stopping to reload after every 12 photographs, the system was able to photograph 60 to 75 employees per hour – and like a Murphy bed, fold against the wall when not in use.

The Graflex, Columbian and other similar systems took head-and-shoulder portraits to create photo buttons and composite identification cards.  For organizations wanting a more secure identification card, cameras and systems were developed that would produce a one-piece, all-photo card.

Typical of these was to two-camera system built by Sam Kitrosser to produce identity cards for the Massachusetts Committee on Public Safety.  Kitrosser built a box equipped with portrait and document lights and two Ansco Memo single frame 35mm cameras mounted near the top.  One camera (loaded with portrait film) faced the subject and the other (loaded with high contrast copy film) shot into a mirror that reflected down into the inside of the box. Placed on the bottom was the subject’s data sheet.

Each camera had film plane masks, one to block out all but the portrait area and the other to block the portrait, permitting the data sheet to be photographed.  By sandwiching both negative together, they could be simultaneously printed to produce an all-photo ID card with data and portrait on a single sheet of photographic paper.  As a one-piece card, it was very hard to switch portraits without the attempt becoming obvious.

In a four-month period in 1942, Kitrosser and his assistant, and four other teams equipped with his identification system, criss-crossed Massachusetts, producing 250,000 identity cards for police, fire, mass transit and other engaged in civil defense and public safety work. 

The Monroe Duo-Camera
While the Kitrosser system and others like it produced a one-piece photo card from sandwiched negatives, a one-piece negative would be more secure.  The October 1941 issue of Photo Technique magazine reported on a system, called the Monroe Duo-Camera, that may well be considered the first modern photo identification system.

Developed by Spencer F. Monroe and marketed by the National Photo Identity Corp of Chicago, the one-step Monroe system produced a one-piece negative and embodied all the core functions of today’s most advanced film-based, central issuance identification systems

The article explained that Monroe got the idea for the camera in 1937 when he tried to cash a $200 expense check at a Miami hotel.  When the cashier asked for identification, Monroe emptied the contents of his wallet on the counter. The skeptical cashier responded. “Mister, all of these cards and things might have been picked off of somebody on the street”.

Monroe finally convinced the cashier of his identity by showing him a newspaper clipping that contained his photograph.

The experience led Monroe to develop a camera system that could simultaneously photograph on a single negative a portrait, signature, and thumb print and written data.  Four years later, in the midst of the concern for national security, the Monroe Duo-Camera entered the market.

The Monroe camera was equipped with two Wollensak fixed focus lenses, three portrait lights and two internal document lights.  The ingenious set-up placed the lenses on opposite sides of the film.  The portrait lens photographed the subject and projected the image onto the front of the film while the document lens projected the information sheet image off of a mirror and onto the back of the film.  Careful masking prevented the images form interfering with each other.

The Monroe camera held 200 feet of 35mm film and was said to be able to photograph an individual in five seconds and about 250 people in an hour.

The unidentified author of the 1941 article acknowledged the importance of photo identification to the war effort, but added this astute prediction about the Monroe photo identification system: “…probably the real future of the device lies in its ability to identify people in their picture helped Mr. Monroe to get his check cashed.”

In fact, photo ID cards have changed little in appearance since World War II.  Most, then as now, contain the holder’s photo, personal information, an identification number, an organizational logo, and the signature of an issuing officer. What has changed since the mid 40’s are the methods of production and security and functional features. 

Specialized Id Development
The first mayor post-war improvement in photo identification was the 1948 introduction of the Polaroid Model 95 instant camera.  First offered to the public in a Boston department store, the camera developed sepia colored pictures in one minute. Most of the demonstration pictures were of customers standing in front of a blank wall and staring into the camera, just as they would if the picture was to be used for an identification card.  In fact, standard Polaroid consumer cameras were used for composite ID card.

The first attempt to turn the standard camera into a more specialized identification product was the 1952 introduction of the Fairchild-Polaroid Id Camera, producing for Id photos on a single sheet of instant Polaroid film.  The Fairchild camera utilized the Model 95 camera back, containing the instant film transport and development system, and replaced the Polaroid lens/shutter assembly with a Wollensak assembly, stereo image splitter and shift lever.

With the lens assembly shifted down, the stereo splitter sent two side-by-side images through the lens and projected them onto the top half of the film.  Without advancing the film the assembly was shifted into its upward position and a second exposure was made, exposing tow new images on the bottom half of the film.

The Fairchild system camera sat on a tripod equipped with tow portrait lights extended right and left and a name plate/ID number holder in front of the camera.  The subject stood in front of a white pull-down screen with his chest placed against the name plate.  The camera could create dual portraits of tow individuals per minute, and allowing 10 minutes for reloading the camera, photograph 100 people in an hour.

In 1955 Polaroid introduced its own beam-splitter lens attachment, called the Stereo-Tech, which required no modifications to the standard Model 95 camera and produced two Id portraits on a single sheet of instant film.

Sam Kitrosser, who had developed a war-time ID camera system, worded for Polaroid after the war and then joined Itek Corp.  In 1961 he developed the Quad Camera for Itek, a four-lens affair that used the workhorse Polaroid Model 95 instant camera back as its film system.  The quad camera employed high-quality lenses and a professional viewing optic that made good use of studio lighting, as well as camera-mounted lights.  A lens cover system allowed the operator to take any or all of the four pictures at the same time.

About the Author

For more iformation on photo id card printers veiw our articles at www.allid.com

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,